Warning (S): you can just jump into another bloggie if you don't wanna hear about politics :P
Keeping on focusing on george w.'s policy, I keep wondering a lot about the American strategy.
Since 2 days, you can hear the American congress repeating:
"We will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise our right of self-defense by acting pre-emptively."
What does that mean? They legitimate an attack by naming it 'a right of self-defense' ? lol
If they go on using such bad arguments, I'll start thinking the German minister was not so wrong in her criticism! That's exatcly the kind of arguments used years ago...
I also wonder why the American government focuses that much on Irak! As if Irak was suddenly the only "American problem"... Are they hidding "national" problems... like economic and social ones? Would they try to keep the attention of the people on Irak to avoid any kind of other crisis? dat's strange.
I read this morning in a paper that thanks to george w.'s position towards hussein, suddenly hussein is winning credit and positive image with the rest of the world.
How true! If we start criticizing george w., we must be very careful to not forget hussein is a dictator, not a victim of some american paranoia ;-)
That's all I wanted to add about the topic, enough with America for the 15 next days:P
phewwwwww;-)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment